# Introduction

**Regressionly** is a software testing team that plugs into yours. It runs
**always-on regression suites** powered by **AI vibe testing**, with an **expert
human tester in the loop on every single run**. AI gives the speed and the
coverage; a person gives the judgment — and signs off.

Regressionly is never fully autonomous. A human sign-off is always part of the
workflow.

## Why it exists

Teams that adopt AI coding assistants often double how fast they ship — and
quietly lose their grip on quality. Features land faster than anyone can re-test
what already exists, and AI-generated code can pass its own AI-generated tests
while still breaking real user flows in ways only a person would notice.

The usual answer is more automation. Regressionly's answer is different: **keep
the automation, add a human.** AI vibe-testing agents provide the speed and
coverage; experienced testers in India provide the judgment, reviewing every run,
every night.

## The Regressionly loop

Every build goes through the same three stages:

1. **AI vibe testing.** AI agents exercise your application like real users —
   clicking, typing, exploring edge cases — and run the full regression suite on
   every build.
2. **Human review — always.** A senior tester reviews every AI run: triaging
   failures, catching what automation rationalises away, and judging what a
   machine cannot — *is this actually right for a user?*
3. **Verified release.** You get a morning-ready report with a human signature on
   it: what passed, what broke, what changed.

Then the loop runs again — every build, every night. That is the regression part.
More detail: [The nightly loop](/getting-started/the-nightly-loop).

## What "AI vibe testing" means

It is exploratory testing done by AI agents that use your application the way a
person would — navigating flows, filling forms, probing edge cases — rather than
running brittle pre-written scripts. It gives breadth and speed that no manual
team can match.

## Why a human, if the AI tests?

Because AI systems are confident even when they are wrong. An AI agent will mark a
subtly broken flow as "passing" if the page loads and the buttons click. A human
tester knows what the feature is for and what a user would put up with — and owns
the verdict. Every report carries the name of the senior tester who reviewed it.

## Team extension from India

Regressionly extends your QA team rather than replacing it:

- **Your day, onshore.** Your QA team pairs with developers on new features and
  does real-time exploratory testing on the sprint.
- **Our night, in India.** The pod runs the full regression suite on the day's
  builds, sweeps every critical flow with AI vibe testing, and a senior tester
  triages and signs off on every run.
- **Your morning.** A human-verified report is waiting before your stand-up.

The time difference is the engine of the model: your builds are tested while your
team is offline. You get a dedicated pod that learns your product deeply, and you
can scale it up or down with your release cadence — no hiring cycle.

## What Regressionly tests

Regression is the flagship, but every service runs through the same
human-in-the-loop model:

- **Regression testing** — always-on suites, run on every release.
- **AI vibe testing** — agents explore your product like real users; humans verify
  everything they flag.
- **Functional and end-to-end testing** — across browsers, devices and environments.
- **API and integration testing** — contract, integration and negative testing.
- **Performance testing** — load, stress and soak tests, with human analysis.
- **Accessibility and UAT support** — WCAG audits and structured acceptance cycles.

See [Services](/working-with-us/services).

## How it compares

AI-only tools are fast but credulous. Traditional QA outsourcing is thorough but
slow. Regressionly is built to be both:

| | Regressionly | AI-only testing tools | Traditional QA outsourcing |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Time to first regression report | 2 weeks | Days | 2–3 months |
| Who is accountable for a missed bug | A named human | A model | A ticket queue |

On top of that, Regressionly pairs AI-speed test execution with a human review of
every run, overnight regression with morning reports, a suite maintained as your
app evolves, and a model that extends your team rather than replacing it.

## Getting started

Every engagement starts with a **free two-week pilot** on your real application,
with no commitment. A pilot starts within a week of the kickoff call; within two
weeks you have a running regression suite on your critical flows and your first
human-verified report. Full coverage grows from there, sprint by sprint.

What Regressionly needs from you: **a test environment, a walkthrough of your
critical user journeys, and a Slack or Teams channel.** Test design, automation,
execution, triage and reporting are handled for you.

If you already have Playwright, Cypress or Selenium suites, they are adopted and
extended. If you have nothing, the suite is built from scratch — and **you own all
of it**, including the code.

Read [The pilot](/getting-started/the-pilot).

## Principles

- **A human signs everything.** You always know who was sure, and why.
- **AI is a power tool, not a replacement.** No verdict ships that a human has not owned.
- **Extend teams, never replace them.** Your QA engineers keep the high-context work.
- **The boring bugs matter most.** A broken filter or a payment edge case is what
  churns customers.

## Where to go next

- [The pilot](/getting-started/the-pilot) — how the free two weeks work.
- [The nightly loop](/getting-started/the-nightly-loop) — what happens on every run.
- [Pricing](/working-with-us/pricing), [Day to day](/working-with-us/day-to-day),
  [Security and confidentiality](/working-with-us/security).
- [Contact](/help/contact) — a senior tester replies within one business day.